By Sharanya R.C., Community Contributor - April 17, 2023
Automation testing has made testing a wide variety of applications easy and practical. We have testing solutions for applications developed with any code base. Any application on any device on any platform can be tested effectively and accurately using these Automation Testing Frameworks.
It is prudent to consider the following aspects when you choose a testing framework:
- Accuracy: Each testing framework is different. They have similarities with their counterparts and some uniqueness of their own. You can choose the proper framework by focusing on which feature of the framework benefits your project the most.
- Scalability: Applications that are developed never go stagnant. They are constantly updated and upgraded, and new features are introduced. So you can select the framework that can handle more extensive and complex codebases.
- Integration: Choose the proper testing framework to make integrating with other software and technologies hassle-free.
- Maintenance” A well-designed framework can help make writing tests easier and maintain them effectively. It saves much time and helps with future updates and upgrades.
- Coverage: The proper testing framework will help you achieve better test coverage, so you can test more aspects of your code and catch more bugs.
- Productivity: An ideal testing framework will quickly run tests and give feedback. It should also help capture bugs earlier in the development process.
What is Jest?
Facebook developed it, and the primary aim of the Jest Testing framework was to keep the test environment user-friendly. If the application is UI intensive, Jest is the go-to framework. It was built on top of the Jasmine Testing Framework. However, Jest has many additional layers and added features.
The following are some of the unique features of the Jest Testing Framework:
- Provides built-in/auto-mocking capabilities, which make it easy to create mock functions and objects for testing. This can help simplify the testing process and make it easier to test complex applications.
- Has a feature called snapshot testing, which allows you to capture a snapshot of the application output and compare it to a previous image. This can help identify unexpected changes in the application output.
- Has built-in code coverage reporting, which allows developers to analyze how much of their code is covered by tests. This can help identify areas of the application that need more testing and improve overall code quality.
- Allows you to run tests in parallel, which can help reduce testing time and speed up the development process.
However, there are some areas where the Jest Testing Framework needs to catch up.
- It allows minimal customization, and tailoring the framework to specific testing needs isn’t easy.
- Owing to its large size, the initial setup time and memory usage can impact the application’s performance. This can be a problem for projects with many functionalities to test or a large codebase.
- Jest has many features and configurations. The learning curve for using Jest can be steeper than other testing frameworks, especially for beginners.
What is Mocha?
Mocha was developed to test applications running on Node.js. It provides a flexible and extensible testing environment. It is well suited for complex testing needs.
Here are some of the key features of Mocha:
- Mocha was developed to test applications running on Node.js.
- It provides a flexible and extensible testing environment and is well-suited for complex testing needs.
- It has multiple ways of generating test summary reports. You may choose whichever suits your project best.
- Supports both Asynchronous and Synchronous Testing.
- Mocha is easy to set up and use, even for developers new to testing. It has a simple and intuitive syntax for writing test cases and comes with a command-line interface that makes it easy to run tests and view results.
- Mocha has a large and active community of developers who contribute to the project and provide support to other users.
- Mocha has a wide range of plugins and integrations, allowing you to customize the framework to our needs.
- Testing an application with a complex backend is easy with Mocha.
While Mocha has many benefits, there are some potential downsides to using this framework:
- Mocha has no built-in assertion library; You must choose and configure one according to your needs. E.g., Chai.
- Auto-mocking and snapshot testing are complicated.
- Mocha performs slower than other software testing frameworks when executing large test suites.
Follow-Up Read: Choosing between Jest and Mocha
What is Jasmine?
Jasmine is an older framework than Jest and Mocha. Jasmine Testing Framework is an open-source framework that comes as a single package.
Some of the key Jasmine framework features are listed below.
- Jasmine Testing Framework primarily supports Behaviour Driven Development (BDD)
- You need not import external libraries while running Jasmine.
- It is compatible with most frameworks and libraries making it versatile and the go-to framework if your primary concern is integration with other tools and libraries.
- Has many built-in assertions that simplify the coding process and help make the code readable.
- Test Scriptwriting is very simple and easy with Jasmine. So, testers who are beginners can benefit from Jasmine.
- For complete end-to-end testing of UI and backend, Jasmine is highly recommended.
- Community support for Jasmine is tremendous but less compared to Mocha.
As with any framework, Jasmine comes with its load of cons too:
- Debugging can be a bit harder than other testing frameworks as it does not provide much information, and the source of the error is difficult to find.
- Jasmine has difficulty with asynchronous testing.
- Though it supports Snapshot testing and has its library, the integration is not easy.
Jest vs Mocha vs Jasmine: Which to choose?
|Jest was primarily developed for React and worked well with Next.js too.||Mocha is better suited for applications designed with Node.js||Jasmine works better with Angular.js.|
|For powerful UI-based applications, Jest is a good choice.||For complex back-end applications, Mocha is a proper fit.||Jasmine works better with light and simple projects.|
|Built-in assertion libraries and auto-mocking features are available.||No built-in assertion libraries are available. You can use external assertions like Chai.||Built-in assertions are available.|
|The auto-mocking feature is part of the Jest package||Test doubles are not built-in. Simon.js can be used for mocking.||Test doubles are part of the Jasmine framework.|
|Jest package has a test runner built within its framework.||Test runners are available.||Test runners are not available by default. We have to install additional test runners like Karma.|
|Asynchronous testing is easy and fetches good results.||Asynchronous testing performance is not as excellent as Jest||Asynchronous testing performance is not as outstanding as Jest|
|Supports only Test Driven Development (TDD)||Supports Behavior Driven Development(BDD) and Test Driven Development (TDD)||Primarily supports Behavior Driven Development(BDD)|
Altogether, each testing framework has its Pros and Cons
- If you want to compare Jest Vs Mocha Vs Jasmine based on speed, Jest is the winner.
- Among the three, Mocha is more flexible, but additional libraries must be installed for certain main features.
- Mocha Vs Jasmine will lead you to choose Mocha for testing heavy and complex back-end applications and Jasmine for lightweight applications.
- For UI testing, when it comes to Jest vs Jasmine, Jest is preferred by many.
- For fast high-grade Selenium Testing that is compatible across 3000+ real mobile devices and desktop browsers, use BrowserStack Automate.
1. Are Jest and Jasmine the same?
- Jest is a more modern and comprehensive testing framework than Jasmine. Jest includes features like snapshot testing, code coverage analysis, and parallel test execution, which are unavailable in Jasmine.
- Jest is developed and maintained by Facebook, while Jasmine is an open-source project maintained by a community of developers.
- Jest has built-in support for mocking and assertions, while Jasmine requires you to use external libraries for these features.
- Jest has a faster test runner than Jasmine, which can make a difference for large test suites.
2. Which is better Jest or Jasmine?
While both Jest and Jasmine are capable testing frameworks, Jest may be a better choice for more complex testing scenarios due to its richer feature set and faster execution speed.
3. Is Jest better than Mocha?
Whether Jest is better than Mocha depends on the specific needs of your project. Both are popular and capable testing frameworks that can do the job effectively.
- Jest is an all-in-one testing framework with features like mocking, assertion, and code coverage analysis.
- While Mocha is a more lightweight framework that focuses on providing a flexible test runner and letting you choose your assertion library and mocking library.
- Mocha provides more flexibility in configuration and integration with other tools, making it a better choice for projects with complex testing requirements.
- Mocha has been around longer than Jest, which means it has a more established user base and a larger collection of plugins and extensions.