Best Practices for Selenium Test Automation
By Jash Unadkat, Technical Content Writer at BrowserStack - November 23, 2020
With constant advancements in digital technologies, web-applications are becoming increasingly sophisticated. This translates to new challenges for QA engineers as they need to perform comprehensive testing of new features across platforms.
Bear in mind that delivering a flawless user experience is mandatory for any website to succeed in the current-day competitive landscape.
Reliable and established open-source tools like Selenium have made it possible for QA engineers to minimize manual testing. They also enable the execution of comprehensive tests faster. However, to get efficient results from Selenium tests, one must be well acquainted with the relevant best practices.
This article will highlight a few of these best practices that will help QAs enhance their Selenium tests.
6 Best Practices to Consider For Selenium Automation
1. Using the Right Locators
For testing the desired web elements of a particular application, QAs need to be proficient in using different locator strategies. After all, if the test scripts cannot identify the correct elements, the tests will fail.
Example: For automating inputs to the Username and Password fields of a login page, the primary step is to locate those text fields. If the script cannot find the Username and Password fields, the login process will not work.
Refer to this detailed guidepost on Locators in Selenium to understand different ways to locate web-elements and which locators are best suited for which situations.
2. Implementing Page Object Model
With ever-increasing customer demands, a website’s UI is bound to evolve after incorporating new changes at regular intervals. Needless to say, locators corresponding to specific UI elements change too. This means QAs need to create new test cases for the same page again, which can be tedious.
One can address this by using the Page Object Model design pattern for creating test scripts. In this design pattern, each web page is considered a class file, and every class file carries corresponding web elements. This technique helps eliminate code duplication and also makes test maintenance more convenient. QAs can also reuse the existing code and make minimal changes.
3. Incorporating Wait Commands
Web browsers take some time to load individual web pages. The page load speed is subjective to network conditions, server issues, or system configurations. To deal with this, QAs often use the Thread.sleep() method, which pauses the automation script for a specified amount of time.
However, this is not the most efficient method. In some cases, a website may take longer to load than the specified time. On the other hand, a website may load quicker than the specified time, resulting in slower test execution. A better, more efficient alternative is to use Implicit or Explicit Wait Commands in Selenium.
4. Planning and Designing Test Cases beforehand
QA teams must have a proper test plan in place before getting started with automation. QA engineers must think about all logical scenarios and create extensive test cases from the end-users’ perspective. Diving straight into automation without a concrete strategy usually leads to bottlenecks in the latter stages.
Often, QAs focus more on verifying whether the scripts run successfully rather than planning for extensive test scenarios. This approach is ineffective for ensuring full-proof testing of web applications.
5. Identifying and Prioritizing Test Cases
Testing complex web applications can be challenging at times. Prioritizing certain test cases over others makes it easier to achieve test coverage goals. QAs must have clarity on which test cases are critical and need to be executed on priority.
Example: A login page is a vital part of any web-application. Naturally, automating tests to verify the login page makes sense. This is because the login page rarely undergoes any modifications but offers an important function. Thus, testing it would be easy, and running the tests would cover a high priority task in the pipeline early on.
6. Running Selenium Tests on Real Devices
Although there are multiple emulators available on the internet for Selenium testing across platforms, running tests on real devices makes a considerable difference.
Emulators are just software programs that mimic the functionality of a device. They are more suitable for testing code changes in the initial stages of development. Besides, emulators for each device-OS combination may not be available, which makes it even more challenging for QAs to test on desired combinations.
Accurate results can only be expected when websites are tested in real user conditions. This allows teams to discover maximum bugs and eventually roll out a robust application.
Teams can leverage cloud-based platforms like BrowserStack that offer a Cloud Selenium Grid of 2000+ real browsers and devices. It empowers teams to run concurrent Selenium tests on desired device-browser combinations online. This makes it convenient for QA engineers to perform comprehensive cross-browser and device testing across platforms. One can also integrate their test pipelines with CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Travis, Circle CI, etc.
Selenium automation seeks to reduce manual testing efforts, increase execution speed, and identify the maximum number of bugs at the earliest. However, in order to get the most out of their Selenium scripts, QAs must follow the selenium best practices highlighted above. This will also help in establishing a reliable test cycle.