GraphQL simplifies data fetching, but its error handling often confuses developers since failures can return alongside a 200 OK response. .
Overview
GraphQL errors occur when a query, mutation, or subscription fails due to issues in syntax, validation, execution, or the underlying network. They are returned in the errors field of the response, often alongside partial data.
Common GraphQL Errors and Their Solutions:
- Syntax Errors: Caused by malformed queries.
Solution: Validate queries with tools like GraphiQL or linters before execution. - Validation Errors: When queries don’t match the schema (unknown fields, missing arguments).
Solution: Keep schema and client queries in sync using code generation or schema validation tools. - Resolver Errors: Exceptions or logic issues during field resolution.
Solution: Add proper error handling and logging inside resolvers. - Authentication/Authorization Errors: Missing or invalid tokens, unauthorized access.
Solution: Implement authentication middleware and enforce role-based access in resolvers. - Network Errors: Connectivity issues, timeouts, or server misconfigurations.
Solution: Use retries, proper timeout settings, and monitor server health.
This article explores the different types of GraphQL errors, their root causes, practical solutions, and effective debugging strategies for API testing.
What are GraphQL Errors?
GraphQL errors represent issues that occur when a query or mutation cannot be executed as intended. Unlike traditional REST APIs, where errors are often tied directly to HTTP status codes, GraphQL can return a 200 OK response even if part, or all, of the operation fails. In such cases, the response body includes an errors array that provides detailed information about what went wrong.
Each error object typically contains:
- Message: A human-readable explanation of the error.
- Locations: The part of the query where the error occurred.
- Path: The specific field or operation affected.
- Extensions: Optional metadata, such as error codes or classifications.
These errors can arise from different stages of execution, parsing, validation, runtime resolution, or even transport-level failures. Understanding how they’re structured and where they originate is the first step in testing and debugging GraphQL APIs effectively.
Read More: Cypress API Testing: A Comprehensive Guide
Types of GraphQL Errors
GraphQL errors appear in different phases of the request lifecycle. Here are the most common types and how they manifest:
1. Syntax Errors
Triggered when the query or mutation is malformed (e.g., missing braces, invalid tokens).
These are caught immediately during parsing, preventing the query from running at all.
Example: Unexpected Name “usre” instead of user.
2. Validation Errors
Happen when the query doesn’t match the schema, such as requesting a non-existent field or omitting required arguments. They ensure that only valid queries aligned with the schema can proceed to execution.
Example: Querying email on a type that doesn’t expose it.
3. Execution / Resolver Errors
Raised when resolver functions throw exceptions or business logic fails during runtime. These errors often surface as partial responses, where some fields succeed while others fail.
Example: Database connection issues or invalid type conversions.
4. Authentication & Authorization Errors
Occur when users lack valid credentials or don’t have permission to access a field or resource. They are crucial for protecting sensitive data and are typically surfaced with clear error messages.
Example: Unauthorized access to an admin field.
5. Network & Transport Errors
Stem from issues outside the query itself, timeouts, server crashes, or misconfigured endpoints. These failures prevent the request from completing and often appear as HTTP 4xx/5xx responses.
Example: 500 Internal Server Error or request timeouts.
Primary Causes of GraphQL Errors
GraphQL errors can arise from multiple layers in the request-response cycle. Understanding their root causes helps in diagnosing issues faster and building more reliable APIs.
- Malformed Queries: Incorrect syntax, missing braces, or typos in field names often result in parsing errors.
- Schema Mismatches: Queries that don’t align with the schema, such as calling undefined fields or skipping required arguments, lead to validation errors.
- Resolver Failures: Bugs in resolver logic, unhandled exceptions, or backend system failures (like database downtime) cause execution errors.
- Improper Authentication or Authorization: Missing tokens, expired credentials, or lack of user permissions block queries from being executed.
- Network and Transport Issues: MServer misconfigurations, timeouts, or connectivity failures prevent GraphQL requests from completing successfully.
- Improper Error Handling in Implementation: Some servers expose overly generic or overly detailed error messages, making it difficult to debug securely and effectively.
Error Handling Patterns & Best Practices
Effective error handling in GraphQL requires consistency and clarity so both clients and testers can quickly identify issues and recover gracefully. Here are some key practices:
1. Standardize error shape: Return consistent fields so consumers can automate handling.
{
"data": { "user": null },
"errors": [
{
"message": "User not found",
"path": ["user"],
"extensions": { "code": "NOT_FOUND", "httpStatus": 404, "traceId": "9c2e..." }
}
]
}2. Adopt stable error codes: Define a small enum such as UNAUTHENTICATED, FORBIDDEN, NOT_FOUND, VALIDATION_FAILED, RATE_LIMITED, and map exceptions to them centrally.
3. Design for partial success: Keep non-critical fields nullable so UIs can render available data even when some resolvers fail.
4. Model recoverable failures as data: Make expected business errors part of the schema for type-safe branching.
union UserResult = User | NotFoundError | ValidationError
type NotFoundError { message: String!, code: String! }
type ValidationError { message: String!, fields: [FieldError!]! }
type FieldError { field: String!, message: String! }5. Validate inputs at the edge: Run input validation before resolvers and return structured feedback.
type Mutation {
register(input: RegisterInput!): RegisterResult!
}6. Mask sensitive details; log securely: Send friendly message and extensions.code to clients; log stack traces and context on the server with a traceId.
7. Centralize mapping and telemetry: Wrap resolvers with middleware to catch errors, attach traceId, and emit metrics by extensions.code.
8. Client handling with Apollo (concise setup): Use errorPolicy for partial data and onError for routing logic.
import { ApolloClient, HttpLink, InMemoryCache } from "@apollo/client";
import { onError } from "@apollo/client/link/error";
const errorLink = onError(({ graphQLErrors, networkError }) => {
graphQLErrors?.forEach(e => {
const code = e.extensions?.code;
if (code === "UNAUTHENTICATED") {/* trigger reauth */}
if (code === "RATE_LIMITED") {/* show retry-after hint */}
});
if (networkError) {/* offline/toast/report */}
});
const client = new ApolloClient({
link: errorLink.concat(new HttpLink({ uri: "/graphql" })),
cache: new InMemoryCache(),
defaultOptions: { query: { errorPolicy: "all" } }
});9. Retry with care: Only retry idempotent operations on transient conditions (timeouts, RATE_LIMITED) using exponential backoff; never auto-retry non-idempotent mutations.
Debugging GraphQL Errors with Requestly HTTP Interceptor
GraphQL responses often contain both data and errors, making it important to inspect payloads closely during testing. Requestly HTTP Interceptor, a browser-based tool that captures, modifies, and mocks HTTP/GraphQL traffic in real time, helps by recording GraphQL requests and responses as they happen, allowing testers to:
- View the errors[] field, including messages, paths, and extensions.
- Mock responses to simulate scenarios like VALIDATION_FAILED or RATE_LIMITED without backend changes.
- Modify headers (e.g., remove Authorization) to reproduce authentication and authorization failures.
- Introduce delays or failures to test client resilience against timeouts and server errors.
By injecting controlled error scenarios, Requestly by BrowserStack ensures that GraphQL clients handle failures gracefully and that error-handling logic is thoroughly validated before production.
Conclusion
GraphQL’s flexible query model introduces unique challenges in error handling, from syntax and validation issues to resolver, authentication, and network failures. A structured approach, using consistent error shapes, stable error codes, and clear client-side handling, ensures that APIs remain predictable and applications resilient.
By combining best practices with tools Requestly HTTP Interceptor, teams can not only detect and debug issues faster but also simulate failure scenarios that are hard to reproduce in staging. In doing so, they build GraphQL systems that are both developer-friendly and production-ready.
Featured Article
