Introduction
In the fast-paced world of software development, where a single bug can lead to significant project delays and financial losses, Autodesk faced the critical challenge of ensuring flawless software releases. Zohar Liran, Director, Head of Engineering, Construction Platform at Autodesk, recognized the imperative of robust end-to-end testing to maintain user trust and operational efficiency. This case study explores how Autodesk, a global leader in 3D design, engineering, and entertainment software, in partnership with BrowserStack, transitioned from fragmented testing practices to a highly automated, visually precise, and confidence-inspiring testing strategy.
Ensuring Quality and Speed in a Complex Environment
Autodesk develops software used by millions worldwide to design, engineer, and create everything from buildings and products to visual effects for films. The complexity and widespread use of their software necessitate an equally robust and reliable platform. Before their partnership with BrowserStack, Autodesk grappled with several testing hurdles:
- Reliance on Manual QA: Many teams were still heavily reliant on manual functional and visual testing, leading to slower release cycles and a higher risk of defects reaching production.
- Browser and Platform Fragmentation: Supporting multiple browsers, operating systems (macOS, Windows), and mobile platforms introduced significant testing overhead and inconsistencies.
- Inefficient End-to-End Testing: Running comprehensive end-to-end tests across various user permissions and project configurations was time-consuming and prone to errors.
- Component Library Validation: Ensuring visual consistency and integrity across a vast library of reusable UI components was a significant challenge, especially when changes in one component could inadvertently affect others.
- Bridging the Gap Between Engineering and QA: A philosophical divide sometimes existed between development and QA teams, hindering a unified approach to quality assurance.
- Test Flakiness and Brittleness: Existing automated tests occasionally suffered from flakiness, undermining confidence in the test suite’s reliability.