Introduction
Mastercard is a global technology leader with a vast and complex digital ecosystem. The company manages over 150 digital products and platforms and more than 1,000 documentation and content pages, with UI updates being pushed daily by teams across the world. Ensuring brand consistency and a flawless user experience at this scale presents a significant quality assurance challenge.
Visual Regressions and the Limits of Functional Testing
For the quality engineering team at Mastercard, maintaining visual integrity across a sprawling digital portfolio was a critical priority. The high velocity of daily code changes from global teams created a significant risk of introducing unintended visual bugs. A single CSS modification could have a cascading impact, altering the appearance of hundreds of screens unexpectedly.
The core challenge lay in a gap that traditional testing methodologies could not fill. Functional automation frameworks are designed to verify application logic—does the login button authenticate a user?—but are fundamentally blind to visual correctness. A test could pass while the button itself was rendered in the wrong color, misaligned, or overlapping another element. This created a significant risk of brand dilution and a degraded user experience.
“Manually validating is just not a feasible solution,” explained Harit Narke, a Lead Software Engineer on the team. “It’s slow, it’s prone to error, and we needed a smarter automation solution.” The difficulty of manual checks was clear; in demonstrations, teams often struggled to spot even a fraction of the dozens of subtle changes on a single page. At Mastercard’s scale, this manual approach was unsustainable, creating a major bottleneck and leaving the brand vulnerable to visual regressions.