SiteImprove Alternatives for Accessibility Testing

As businesses strive for digital accessibility and quality, platforms like Siteimprove have become popular solutions for managing website performance, accessibility, and SEO. However, while Siteimprove offers a comprehensive suite of tools, it may not meet every team’s needs.

For teams seeking greater flexibility, cost-effectiveness, or more specialized features, exploring Siteimprove alternatives becomes a valuable consideration.

This article explores the top SiteImprove alternatives, comparing their strengths, limitations, and pricing.

What is SiteImprove?

Siteimprove is a digital optimization platform that helps organizations improve website accessibility, content quality, and overall performance. It combines accessibility testing, content governance, analytics, and SEO in one unified solution.

Built to support WCAG, ADA, and European Accessibility Act compliance, the platform offers automated scans, guided testing, and real-time monitoring. It also helps teams ensure brand consistency and optimize user engagement.

Some of the key features

• Automated accessibility scans and compliance tracking
• Content quality checks and SEO insights
• Visual dashboards and engagement analytics
• Monitoring of content quality, broken links, spelling, and readability

While it’s best known for accessibility testing, SiteImprove also includes analytics and policy enforcement features to support broader digital strategies.

SiteImprove Alternatives: Quick Overview

Below is a quick comparison of popular SiteImprove alternatives, highlighting what each tool offers and where it stands out.

Top 12 SiteImprove Alternatives

Below are the top 12 SiteImprove alternatives, each offering unique strengths in accessibility testing to help you find the right fit for your team’s needs.

1. BrowserStack Accessibility Testing

BrowserStack Accessibility testing offers a unified accessibility testing solution that combines automated scanning with manual testing support. Its Spectra™ engine detects a wider range of WCAG issues, while real screen reader access and assisted keyboard testing make it suitable for thorough compliance checks.

Pricing

• Free Plan: Unlimited On-demand Website Scans and Scan user workflows up to 5 unique pages
• Test & Monitor Plan: Starts from $199 per month
• Automate & Monitor: $459 per month
• Enterprise: Contact Sales

Features:

• Spectra™ Rule Engine: Detects up to 66% more critical issues than standard checkers, aligned with WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA.
• Automated Page Scans: Scans full websites or workflows for issues like contrast, headings, and ARIA attributes.
• Real Device Screen Reader Testing: Supports NVDA, VoiceOver, and TalkBack for manual testing on actual devices.
• Keyboard Navigation Checks: Validates focus order and tab navigation across interactive elements.
• Assisted Manual Testing: Guides testers through checks for forms, skip links, focus states, and visual cues.
• Recurring Scans: Enables scheduled monitoring and regression tracking across deployments.
• Detailed Issue Reports: Highlights issues by severity with fix recommendations and export options.
• Centralized Dashboard: Tracks scores, trends, scan history, and performance metrics over time.

Pros

• Advanced automated engine with high coverage of critical issues
• Real screen reader and keyboard testing capabilities on live devices
• Built-in guided manual testing and focus validation
• Easy integration with CI/CD pipelines and collaboration tools
• Comprehensive reporting and historical trend analysis

2. Evinced

Combining AI and computer vision, Evinced automates accessibility testing across web apps and mobile interfaces. It identifies issues that usually require manual evaluation, clusters related problems for easier analysis, and integrates directly into development workflows.

Pricing: Custom pricing

Features

• AI-powered detection of WCAG violations
• Chrome debugger extension for real‑time dev testing
• Clustering of issues to reduce noise
• Workflow integration across websites and mobile apps
• Secure deployment within CI/CD pipelines

Pros

• Real-time remediation guidance in-browser
• Reduces manual review through intelligent clustering

Cons

• May require team training to interpret AI‑driven insights
• Less community documentation compared to open‑source peers

3. WAVE

WAVE is a lightweight, browser-based tool that visually overlays accessibility issues on web pages. It emphasizes human-led evaluation by highlighting potential problems and offering contextual education around WCAG failures.

Pricing

• Browser extension: free

Features

• Real‑time overlay of icons and indicators in Chrome/Firefox/Edge
• Supports intranet, login‑protected, and dynamic pages
• Free browser extension with local page scanning
• Subscription API for automated site‑wide scans
• Contextual help and guidance for each issue

Pros

• Completely free and easy to use
• Helps educate users with visual feedback
• Works on secure pages with no data leaving the browser

Cons

• No integration with CI/CD or workflows
• Limited to page‑level insights (no site‑wide reporting)
• Depends heavily on manual interpretation 

4. accessiBe

accessiBe uses AI to implement accessibility adjustments via an overlay that claims to automate WCAG/ADA compliance. Updates run daily, and the tool offers both AI-driven remediation and optional expert support.

Pricing

• Micro plan: $490/year for up to 5,000 visits/month
• Professional: $1,490/year for up to 30,000 pages
• Scale: $3,490/year for up to 100,000 pages

Features

• Automated scans and remediation every 24 hours
• Accessibility overlay supporting screen readers and keyboard navigation
• White‑label customization of widget appearance
• Option for human expert review and custom fixes
• Analytics dashboard for monitoring compliance

Pros

• Near‑instant deployment without code changes
• Handles dynamic content and interactive elements
• Optional expert support and litigation backing

Cons

• Expert groups warn against relying solely on AI
• Can misinterpret visuals and semantically important elements
• Annual pricing based on traffic starts around $490, may rise to $3,490+

5. UserWay

UserWay is an AI-driven accessibility overlay that adds quick accessibility enhancements to websites with minimal coding. It is often used by businesses aiming to achieve basic compliance quickly and with minimal disruption.

Pricing

• Free version available for basic use.
• Paid plans offer advanced features, legal support, and reporting tools.

Features

• AI-based widget easily integrated into any website
• Real-time interface adjustments like font resizing, contrast changes, and keyboard support
• Paid tiers include monitoring, issue detection, and compliance alerts
• Supports key standards including WCAG 2.1, ADA, and Section 508

Pros

• Installs quickly with just a single code snippet
• Free tier available for teams starting with accessibility

Cons

• Overlay approach may not satisfy all compliance requirements
• Does not replace manual or code-level accessibility fixes

6. Accessibility Insights (by Microsoft)

Accessibility Insights is a free, open-source tool from Microsoft designed to help developers find and fix WCAG and Section 508 issues using guided manual testing and automated checks.

Pricing
Entirely free to use under Microsoft open-source licensing

Features

• Automated fast checks and full assessments
• Guided manual checks for keyboard navigation, color contrast, and focus order
• Exportable reports compatible with CSV and Azure DevOps
• Accessible browser extensions for Chrome and Edge
• Integration with DevTools and keyboard-only mode
• Includes assessment for Windows, Android, and mixed-reality apps

Pros

• Completely free and open-source
• Comprehensive combination of manual and automated testing
• Strong support for developer workflows and tooling

Cons

• Primarily page-level; lacks site-wide scanning and dashboards
• Requires manual effort for full assessments
• Limited collaboration or multi-user features

7. Pa11y

Pa11y offers a suite of open-source, command‑line, and CI-friendly tools (CLI, Dashboard, CI) for automated WCAG testing using axe-core or HTML_CodeSniffer.

Pricing

• Completely free and open-source under open-source licensing

Features

• CLI tool for single-page audits with detailed CSS selectors
• Pa11y CI integrates with CI pipelines for multi-page monitoring
• Supports customizable runners and JSON/CSV/HTML reporting
• Plugin support and flexible configuration
• Suitable for dynamic content testing

Pros

• Free, open-source, no login required
• Highly customizable and integrates easily into development workflows
• Active community and strong documentation

Cons

• Command‑line based, less user-friendly for non-technical users
• No built-in manual testing guidance
• Doesn’t offer enterprise dashboards or collaboration tools

8. Lighthouse (by Google)

An open-source, automated auditing tool built into Chrome DevTools that evaluates accessibility, performance, SEO, and best practices. Suitable for developers running local tests and catching accessibility issues early.

Pricing

• 100% free and open-source

Features

• Accessibility audits aligned with WCAG standards
• Detailed failure descriptions and improvement recommendations
• Runs in-browser, via CLI, or as a Node module
• Integrated Lighthouse CI to prevent regressions
• Covers performance, SEO, and best-practice checks in one report

Pros

• Completely free and open-source
• Easy integration into DevTools or CI pipelines
• Offers multi-category audits beyond accessibility

Cons

• Page-level only; no support for full-site scanning or historical tracking
• Lacks manual testing guidance
• Reports can be verbose for non-technical stakeholders

9. EqualWeb Accessibility Scanner

A real-time page-level WCAG 2.2/ADA compliance scanner plus a customizable accessibility widget that enhances user experience dynamically.

Pricing

• Small: $30/month
• Medium: $49/month
• Large: $109/month
• Huge: $169/month

Features

• Chrome extension for real-time page audit
• Scans behind login pages and archives results
• Widget supports voice commands, text resizing, contrast toggles, and screen readers
• Unlimited scans and saved history via dashboard 
• Provides an alt-text editor and overall accessibility score 

Pros

• Free extension with unlimited audits
• Widget delivers on-the-fly accessibility improvements
• Can handle login-restricted and behind-auth pages

Cons

• Focused on individual pages; lacks full-site reporting
• Widget may mask underlying code issues
• Dashboards for monitoring require paid plans

10. TPGi ARC Platform

TPGi ARC is an enterprise accessibility platform that combines automated testing, manual reviews, and continuous monitoring. It includes tools, dashboards, and integrations to help large organizations manage accessibility at scale.

Pricing: Custom, quote-based pricing depending on scale and features.

Features

• Automated and manual accessibility testing
• ARC Dashboard for analytics and progress tracking
• Compliance checks for WCAG 2.1/2.2, EN 301 549, and Section 508
• Remediation guidance with code-level fixes and training resources
• ARC Toolkit, JAWS Inspect, and color contrast checker
• SaaS or self-hosted deployment options
• Mobile and PDF accessibility testing

Pros

• Comprehensive platform with analytics, training, and monitoring
• Actionable remediation guidance for faster fixes
• Scalable and integrates with enterprise workflows

Cons

• Full platform can be complex for smaller teams
• Some issues still require manual remediation

11. SortSite (by PowerMapper)

SortSite is a desktop and web-based auditing tool that checks entire websites for accessibility, SEO, usability issues, broken links, and compliance with web standards—all with a single click.

Pricing

•  Free trial available.
•  Plans start at $49/month (Small), $149/month (Medium), and $299/month (Large).

Features

• Full-site crawler that scans all pages for issues
• Supports accessibility guidelines including WCAG and Section 508
• Validates HTML and CSS structure
• Detects spelling errors and broken links
• Runs browser compatibility checks
• Allows one-click export of audit results
• Available as a desktop app and command-line interface

Pros

• Checks over 1,300 compliance and quality metrics
• Offers visual dashboards and site maps for easier navigation
• Exportable reports for sharing and documentation

Cons

• User interface may appear outdated compared to newer tools
• Basic plan comes with limitations on scans and reports
• Lacks integrations with modern development workflows

12. Level Access AMP (Accessibility Management Platform)

Level Access AMP is a comprehensive enterprise platform that supports end-to-end digital accessibility management. It combines automated scanning, manual auditing, training, and compliance reporting to help large organizations meet accessibility goals at scale.

Pricing

• Pricing is custom and based on user roles, asset volume, and services required.
• Free trial and demo are available upon request.

Features

• Automated testing with Access Engine for websites, apps, and documents
• Manual audit management and expert consulting services
• Centralized dashboard with issue tracking, workflows, and compliance monitoring
• Integration with CI/CD pipelines, Jira, and other dev tools
• Access to training resources, documentation, and policy templates
• Reporting features to support legal documentation and VPAT creation

Pros

• Offers legal compliance tools and expert consulting
• Combines automation, manual review, and governance in one platform

Cons

• Requires onboarding and training to use effectively
• Interface and depth may be overwhelming for basic accessibility needs

Why do you need a SiteImprove Alternative?

While SiteImprove offers a broad set of accessibility and optimization tools, several limitations prompt teams to explore better-suited alternatives, including:

• Dynamic Content Coverage: Automated scans don’t fully capture post-interaction or JavaScript-driven changes, requiring manual testing or developer tool integration.
• Integration Needs: CI/CD and workflow integration are supported but may need setup effort to fit custom pipelines.
• UI at Scale: Generally user-friendly, but navigation can be less smooth for very large or complex sites.
• Advanced Reporting Limits: Strong reporting features, though extremely granular customization may require other tools.
• Cost Barrier: Pricing can be high for smaller teams or limited budgets.
• Steep Learning Curve: Users find the learning curve steep due to the overwhelming number of features and frequent interface changes.

Why Choose BrowserStack Accessibility Testing?

BrowserStack Accessibility Testing stands out as a strong alternative to SiteImprove due to its balance of automation, manual testing support, and developer-first design. It offers advanced issue detection with its proprietary Spectra™ engine and allows real testing with screen readers on real devices, giving teams a more complete view of accessibility performance.

Unlike platforms that rely solely on overlays or static scans, BrowserStack supports workflow-level testing, keyboard navigation checks, and dynamic content evaluation.

With seamless CI/CD integrations, an intuitive dashboard, and a flexible pricing model (including a free tier), it’s well-suited for both development teams and enterprise accessibility programs.

• Combines automated and manual accessibility testing in one platform
• Allows testing with real screen readers on actual devices for accurate results
• Integrates seamlessly into CI/CD pipelines like GitHub, GitLab, and Jenkins
• Handles dynamic content and single-page applications effectively
• Offers flexible plans, including a free tier for small teams or early adoption
• Provides actionable, developer-friendly issue reports with clear remediation steps
• Reduces the need for multiple tools by offering end-to-end accessibility coverage
• Built for agile workflows, enabling early detection and continuous compliance

Talk to an Expert

Conclusion

SiteImprove is a strong starting point for accessibility and website quality, but it may fall short for teams needing greater flexibility, real device testing, or scalable workflows. Its reliance on automation, limited dynamic content support, and higher pricing can be restrictive.

There are several effective alternatives, from browser-based tools to enterprise platforms, each suited to different team sizes and priorities.

For a more balanced approach, BrowserStack Accessibility Testing combines automation, manual testing, and real device coverage, making it ideal for teams focused on both usability and compliance.