Xray has become a popular test management solution within the Jira ecosystem, providing smooth integration for teams operating in Agile and DevOps environments.
However, as testing requirements evolve, particularly with the growing emphasis on automation, continuous integration, and cross-team collaboration, organizations may find that Xray’s capabilities no longer meet the demands of modern software quality practices.
This article explores twelve leading alternatives to Xray, each offering distinct advantages in test case management, automation readiness, and collaborative efficiency.
What is Xray?
Xray is a test management tool designed to work natively within Jira, enabling teams to manage both manual and automated tests as part of their software development lifecycle. Developed by Xblend, Xray allows users to create, organize, execute, and report on test cases directly within Jira issues, maintaining full traceability between requirements, defects, and tests.
It supports various testing methodologies, including manual testing, automated testing through integration with CI/CD pipelines, and behavior-driven development (BDD) using Gherkin syntax. Xray also provides advanced reporting capabilities, test execution tracking, and integration with popular tools like Jenkins, Bamboo, and Cucumber.
While Xray is well-suited for teams already embedded in the Atlassian ecosystem, some organizations encounter challenges as their testing processes grow more complex. These limitations often prompt the search for alternative solutions that offer better scalability and better automation support.
Read More: 17 Best Test Management Tools For Jira
Xray Alternatives: Quick Overview
With an understanding of what Xray offers and where it may fall short for certain teams, the following table provides a quick overview of alternatives that address a range of test management needs.
| BrowserStack Test Management A Jira-integrated test management tool built for fast, scalable QA workflows. It offers intuitive test case management, real-time collaboration, and seamless integration with automated test results. |
| TestRail TesRail offers test organization, reporting, and strong Jira and CI/CD tool integrations, ideal for both manual and automated testing teams. |
| Zephyr Scale/Zephyr Squad Jira-native tools for test case management; Zephyr Squad is best for small teams, while Zephyr Scale offers enterprise-grade capabilities with greater scalability and flexibility. |
| TestLink An open-source, cost-effective solution for managing test cases, although its dated UI requires more technical effort to operate efficiently. |
| PractiTest A feature-rich, end-to-end test management platform with powerful dashboards, traceability, and support for manual, automated, and exploratory testing, all tightly integrated with Jira. |
| Qase A test management tool with REST API support, automation-friendly workflows, and strong integrations with Jira, GitHub, and CI tools. |
| Testmo A unified platform that combines manual, exploratory, and automated testing in a single interface, with robust Jira integration and DevOps readiness. |
| TestLodge A simple and intuitive tool focused on core test case management features, suitable for smaller teams looking for a lightweight and effective solution. |
| QAComplete (SmartBear) An enterprise-grade test management system that integrates well with other SmartBear products, offering full lifecycle management for both automated and manual testing. |
| ReQtest Combines test case management with requirements and issue tracking, designed to support Agile teams with a strong emphasis on traceability and team collaboration. |
| Tuskr A fresh, budget-friendly tool with a smooth UI and features like requirement mapping, run planning, and bug tracking, all integrated with Jira and Slack. |
| Testiny A lightweight, user-focused tool with a fast UI, collaborative features, and seamless Jira integration, great for smaller or Agile teams looking for speed and simplicity. |
Top 12 Xray Alternatives
Below is a detailed overview of twelve alternatives to Xray, highlighting their key features and how they support different test management needs.
1. BrowserStack Test Management
BrowserStack Test Management is a cloud-based test management platform designed to help QA teams centralize and streamline their testing efforts. It allows teams to manage both manual and automated test cases, track execution results, and collaborate efficiently, all within a unified interface.
Built to support Agile and DevOps workflows, it integrates seamlessly with tools like Jira, GitHub, and CI/CD pipelines.
Pricing
- Free up to 5 users
Key Features
- Centralized repository for manual and automated test cases
- Native integration with Jira for issue tracking and traceability
- Test result imports from popular automation frameworks such as Selenium, Playwright, and Cypress
- Customizable dashboards and detailed execution reports
- Support for test case versioning, tagging, and reuse
- Role-based access control for team collaboration
- Tight integration with BrowserStack’s testing infrastructure
Pros
- Clean and intuitive user interface, easy to adopt for both testers and developers
- Supports end-to-end traceability between requirements, test cases, and defects
- Real-time visibility into test execution across teams and projects
- Quick setup with out-of-the-box integrations
- Scales well for teams using both manual and automated testing approaches
2. TestRail
TestRail is a widely adopted test management tool designed to help teams plan, organize, and track software testing efforts more effectively.
It supports both manual and automated testing and is known for its robust reporting capabilities, customizable workflows, and seamless integration with issue tracking tools such as Jira, Asana, and GitHub.
Pricing
- Professional Plan: $37 per seat/month
- Enterprise Plan: $74 per seat/month
Key Features
- Structured test case and suite management with rich formatting options
- Integration with automation tools through REST APIs and CI/CD pipelines
- Real-time dashboards and advanced reporting with built-in analytics
- Full traceability between requirements, test cases, and defects
- Configurable roles, permissions, and test workflows
- Support for parallel and bulk test execution
Pros
- Mature and reliable platform with strong community and vendor support
- Detailed reporting and metrics to support decision-making
- Flexible deployment options (cloud or on-premise)
- Extensive integration options with popular tools and test frameworks
- Scalable for large teams and complex test environments
Cons
- User interface can feel dated compared to newer tools
- Licensing costs may be high for smaller teams or organizations
- Steeper learning curve for non-technical users
3. Zephyr (Scale and Squad)
Zephyr is a test management solution developed by SmartBear, designed to integrate natively with Jira. It is offered in two main variants: Zephyr Squad for small to mid-sized teams and Zephyr Scale for enterprise-level test management. Both versions support manual and automated testing and are built to fit directly into Agile development workflows.
Pricing
- Standard: $10 per month
- Advanced: $30 per month
Key Features
- Test case creation, planning, execution, and traceability within Jira
- Integration with automation tools like Jenkins, Selenium, and Cucumber
- Support for BDD using Gherkin syntax
- Real-time test execution reports and customizable dashboards
- REST API for automation and CI/CD pipeline integration
Pros
- Fully integrated into the Jira ecosystem
- Supports both manual and automated testing workflows
- Flexible test structuring with reusable test steps
- Scalable options for teams of varying sizes
Cons
- Performance can degrade with large volumes of test cases
- UI may feel complex or limiting for some users
- Advanced reporting features are limited in Zephyr Squad
- Pricing varies significantly between Squad and Scale editions
4. TestLink
TestLink is a free and open-source test management tool used by QA teams to manage test cases, test plans, and execution. It offers core functionality for manual testing and integrates with various bug tracking tools like Jira, Bugzilla, and Mantis.
Its simplicity and flexibility make it a popular choice among small teams and organizations with limited budgets.
Pricing: Free, open-source tool
Key Features
- Manual test case creation, grouping, and execution
- Support for multiple user roles and permissions
- Basic requirements management and bug tracking integration
- Test plan versioning and custom fields
- Integration with automation tools through plugins and APIs
Pros
- Completely free and open-source
- Lightweight and easy to host on-premise
- Supports multilingual teams
- Active community with available plugins and customization options
Cons
- Outdated user interface and user experience
- No native support for automated testing frameworks
- Requires technical expertise for setup and maintenance
- Lacks advanced reporting and analytics features
5. PractiTest
PractiTest is a comprehensive test management platform designed to give QA teams end-to-end visibility and control over their testing processes. It supports manual, automated, exploratory, and BDD testing, with a strong focus on traceability and decision-making.
Pricing: $54 per user/month
Key Features
- Centralized management of manual, automated, and exploratory test
- Customizable dashboards, filters, and reporting tools
- Requirements and issue tracking integration
- Support for BDD and test automation through REST API
- Real-time visibility into testing progress and coverage
Pros
- Powerful reporting and visualization tools
- High traceability across test assets
- Regular updates and cloud-based access
- Highly customizable workflows
Cons
- Higher pricing tiers
- Learning curve for new users
- Can be resource-intensive with large projects
6. Qase
Positioned as a next-generation test management tool, Qase combines simplicity with power, making it a strong choice for modern QA teams. Its intuitive interface, automation-friendly design, and seamless integration with popular development tools make it particularly well-suited for Agile and DevOps environments.
Pricing
- Free: Up to 3 users and 2 projects
- Startup: $20/user
- Business: $30/user
- Enterprise: Custom
Key Features
- API-first design
- Reusable test steps and test case versioning
- Integrations with Jira, GitHub, and CI tools
Pros
- Clean and easy-to-use UI
- Affordable for small to mid-sized teams
- Built-in support for automated testing
- Good collaboration tools
Cons
- Limited advanced analytics
- Some integrations require manual setup
- Still growing in feature depth
7. Testmo
Designed for teams that combine manual testing, exploratory sessions, and automation, Testmo brings all testing activities into a single, unified workspace. It emphasizes speed, scalability, and modern development workflows, with built-in support for CI/CD pipelines and seamless integrations with tools like Jira, GitHub, and GitLab.
Pricing
- Team: $99/month with 10 users included
- Business: $329/month per 25 users
- Enterprise: $549/month per 25 users
Key Features
- Unified test types in one interface
- Real-time dashboards and analytics
- Integrations with Jira, GitHub, GitLab, and CI tools
Pros
- Simple, modern interface
- Quick onboarding
- Strong support for automation and DevOps
- Centralized reporting for all test types
Cons
- Limited requirements management
- Basic customization options
- No offline capabilities
8. TestLodge
Focused on simplicity and ease of use, TestLodge helps QA teams manage test plans, test cases, and executions with minimal overhead. It is well-suited for smaller teams or organizations looking for a lightweight, cloud-based solution to support manual testing efforts without the distraction of overly complex features.
Pricing
- Free: 30-day free trial
- Personal: $ 34/month
- Basic: $69/month
- Plus: $139/month
- Premium: $179/month
Key Features
- Test plan and case management
- Requirement linking and reporting
- Integrations with Jira, Trello, and others
Pros
- Very easy to use
- Minimal setup and maintenance
- Clean and distraction-free interface
- Affordable pricing
Cons
- No support for automation
- Limited reporting and analytics
- Few enterprise features
9. QAComplete (SmartBear)
Part of the SmartBear suite, QAComplete offers a full-featured test management solution aimed at enterprise QA teams managing both manual and automated tests. It provides deep integration with other SmartBear tools like ReadyAPI and TestComplete, making it a strong choice for organizations already invested in that ecosystem.
Pricing: Contact Sales for Pricing Information
Key Features
- Centralized test planning and tracking
- Integration with ReadyAPI, SoapUI, and automation tools
- Custom roles and workflows
Pros
- Robust test case organization
- Enterprise-level customization and access control
- Strong automation support
- Good vendor support
Cons
- Complex interface with a steep learning curve
- Expensive for small teams
- Best utilized within the SmartBear ecosystem
10. ReQtest
Built for teams that want unified control over requirements, testing, and bug tracking, ReQtest offers a cloud-based platform that supports the entire software development lifecycle. It is particularly well-suited for Agile teams seeking a lightweight and collaborative tool with traceability between requirements, test cases, and defects.
Pricing: Contact Sales for Pricing Information
Key Features
- Requirements, test cases, and bug tracking in one tool
- Customizable dashboards and filters
- Integration with Jira and Excel
Pros
- All-in-one solution for QA
- Simple and user-friendly interface
- Good traceability features
- Cloud-based, no installation required
Cons
- Limited automation capabilities
- Fewer integration options
- Not optimized for large-scale automation
11. Tuskr
Designed with usability and value in mind, Tuskr provides a modern interface and essential features for managing manual testing. It is especially appealing to small and mid-sized QA teams looking for a clean, efficient tool that balances functionality with simplicity.
Pricing
- Free: 5 max users
- Team: $90 per user/year (5 users minimum)
- Business: $150 per user/year (5 users minimum)
- Enterprise: $290 per user/year (5 users minimum)
Key Features
- Manual test case creation and execution
- Requirement mapping and visual test coverage
- Jira and Slack integrations
Pros
- Clean, modern interface
- Quick onboarding process
- Competitive pricing
- Responsive support team
Cons
- No native automation support
- Lacks advanced enterprise features
- Small user community
12. Testiny
Focused on speed, simplicity, and team collaboration, Testiny offers a lightweight test management solution that helps QA teams stay productive without unnecessary complexity. It is well-suited for Agile teams looking for a fast, cloud-based platform to manage manual testing workflows efficiently.
Pricing
- Free: Upto 3 users
- Advanced: $14.50 per user/month
- Enterprise: Custom
Key Features:
- Test case creation, execution, and planning
- Integration with Jira
- Team collaboration and activity tracking
Pros:
- Easy to use with minimal learning curve
- Fast and responsive interface
- Built for small QA teams
- Quick setup with Jira integration
Cons:
- No support for automation frameworks
- Limited advanced reporting
- Fewer customization options
Why do you need an Xray alternative?
While Xray offers strong test management capabilities within the Jira ecosystem, it may not meet the evolving needs of all teams, particularly those with complex, large-scale, or automation-heavy testing workflows.
As software development practices mature, many organizations require tools that provide greater flexibility, scalability, and usability across the entire quality assurance process.
Common reasons for seeking an alternative to Xray include:
- Performance limitations with large volumes of test cases or executions
- Limited automation support outside of Jira-centric workflows
- Inflexible user interface that may hinder efficiency for non-technical users
- Complex setup and maintenance, especially in scaled environments
- Insufficient reporting or analytics for advanced decision-making
- Cost considerations, particularly for smaller or growing teams
Exploring alternative tools allows teams to align their test management strategy with modern Agile and DevOps practices, integrate more seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, and improve overall visibility and collaboration across projects.
Comparison Table: Xray Alternatives
The table below provides a side-by-side comparison of leading Xray alternatives:
| Tool | Jira Integration | Automation Support | Reporting |
|---|---|---|---|
| BrowserStack Test Management | Yes | Yes (Selenium, Playwright, etc.) | Advanced dashboards |
| TestRail | Yes | Yes (via API/CI) | Detailed reports and metrics |
| Zephyr Scale | Yes (Jira-Native) | Yes (BDD, CI/CD) | Customizable dashboards |
| TestLink | Yes (via Plugins) | No (manual only) | Basic |
| PractiTest | Yes | Yes (CI/CD & BDD) | Advanced visual reports |
| Qase | Yes | Yes (API, CI/CD) | Basic to moderate |
| Testmo | Yes | Yes (CI/CD) | Live dashboards |
| TestLodge | Yes | No | Basic |
| QAComplete | Yes | Yes (SmartBear tools) | Advanced |
| Tuskr | Yes | Limited | Basic |
Why Choose BrowserStack Test Management?
BrowserStack Test Management is a cloud-based test management platform that allows teams to create, organize, and track both manual and automated tests in a unified workspace. It offers seamless integration with Jira, supports a wide range of automation frameworks, and provides detailed reporting to help teams improve test coverage and execution efficiency.
The following points highlight the key benefits that make BrowserStack Test Management a strong choice for QA teams.
- Unified Test Management: Manage manual and automated test cases in one centralized platform, improving visibility and control across the testing lifecycle.
- Seamless Jira Integration: Provides two-way integration with Jira, ensuring full traceability between test cases, test runs, and issues directly from within the platform.
- AI-Assisted Test Case Authoring: Leverages AI to generate, suggest, and improve test steps automatically, accelerating test creation and reducing manual effort.
- Reusable Shared Steps & Bulk Editing: Create and manage shared step templates, and edit multiple test cases in bulk for consistent and efficient test suite updates.
- Advanced Reporting and Dashboards: Offers real-time, customizable dashboards with actionable insights into test health, coverage, and trends.
- Fast Migration from Other Tools: Supports seamless import from tools like TestRail and Xray through auto-mapping of fields, attachments, and test IDs using CSV or API.
- Comprehensive Automation Support: Compatible with 50+ automation frameworks, including Selenium, Cypress, Playwright, and integrates with CI/CD tools like Jenkins, CircleCI, Azure Pipelines, and Bamboo.
- Scalable for Enterprise Needs: Includes features like role-based access control, data residency options, and geo-restrictions to meet enterprise-grade compliance and security standards.
Conclusion
Choosing the right test management tool is essential for improving efficiency, maintaining traceability, and supporting the growth of your quality assurance processes. While Xray remains a widely used solution within the Jira environment, it may not fully address the increasing need for flexibility, deeper automation support, or more intuitive user experiences.
For teams looking to modernize their approach, BrowserStack Test Management offers a practical and forward-looking solution. With its clean interface, seamless Jira integration, strong support for automated testing, and advanced reporting capabilities, it helps simplify test operations while scaling with your team’s evolving needs.
Featured Article
