How to Load Test a Website?

Load testing is a crucial performance check that assesses how well a system handles expected or peak user activity. It’s like stress-testing a bridge before letting cars drive over it to ensure it can support heavy traffic without collapsing.

By doing this, you prevent the system from crashing or slowing down during busy times, ensuring a smooth experience for users.

What is Load Testing?

Load testing checks how a system performs when multiple users access it at the same time. Simulating real user traffic helps identify issues like slow response times or system limitations. This ensures that websites, apps, or servers stay stable and efficient, even during busy periods, preventing crashes and downtime while providing a smooth user experience.

How to Load Test a Website?

Load testing a website involves simulating real user traffic to see how the site performs under different demand levels. The goal is to find any weak spots, ensure the site remains reliable, and maintain a good user experience, especially during busy times.

Some key steps in load testing a website are:

1. Define Your Objectives: Clarify what you want to achieve with the load test, such as testing specific features or the overall capacity of the site. Clear goals help design effective tests and interpret results correctly.
2. Understand Realistic Usage Scenarios: Gather information on how users typically behave, such as the number of users accessing the site at once, peak times, and device types. This data helps make the tests reflect real-world conditions.
3. Select the Right Load Testing Tools: Choose a testing tool that fits the technical needs and expertise of the team. Tools vary in how they simulate traffic, from backend requests to full user interactions, and each type has its strengths and weaknesses.
4. Create and Run Test Scenarios: Design test scripts to model the user actions and workflows being tested. These can range from simple interactions like API calls to more complex, full user journeys. Some tools can even record user sessions for realistic testing.
5. Monitor and Analyze Results: While tests run, track important factors like response times, error rates, and resource usage. Analyze this data to identify any performance issues, bottlenecks, or failures that could affect users.
6. Iterate and Optimize: Use the insights gained to improve the website’s performance and retest to confirm the improvements. Load testing is an ongoing process, especially as the site and traffic patterns change.

Website Load Testing Approaches

To measure performance, testers usually focus on response times, which are influenced by two main factors:

• Frontend performance
• Backend performance

Different approaches, like testing backend vs. frontend performance or focusing on different types of testing, can impact the strategy and results. This section will discuss these approaches in detail.

Frontend Performance Load Testing

Front-end performance testing focuses on measuring how an application performs on the user interface level, such as how quickly page elements load and become interactive in a browser. It is most useful when testing the experience of individual users interacting with the application, especially after the application code and infrastructure are fully integrated.

Why is it Important?

Front-end performance testing looks at metrics like page rendering speed and user interaction speed with UI elements.

It’s crucial for ensuring a smooth user experience. While it excels at pinpointing issues on the micro level, it doesn’t reveal problems in the underlying system architecture.

However, it can be costly to scale and may not be suitable for high-load tests due to the resource demands of automated tools.

Backend performance Load Testing

Backend performance testing focuses on evaluating how the underlying application servers handle load, particularly in production-like conditions. It examines how server-side components process, serve, and deliver assets to users, making it ideal for testing the efficiency of application servers, databases, and APIs under various loads.

Why is it Important?

Backend performance testing is broader in scope than frontend performance testing, allowing teams to target specific components or their integrations.

It’s especially useful for identifying performance issues early in the development process. Backend testing is typically less resource-intensive, making it better suited for simulating high loads and ensuring that the system can handle significant traffic without failure.

Front end vs Back end: What to choose?

Testing frontend and backend performance is essential for ensuring an application runs smoothly and provides a good user experience.

Ignoring one area can lead to problems that make the app slower or harder to use. For smaller tests, focusing on either the frontend or backend may be a good starting point, with plans to test both in the future.

The table below compares the two approaches to help decide which to prioritize based on specific needs.

Types of Website Load Testing

Here are the types of website load testing:

Component Load Testing

What it is:

Component load testing focuses on testing specific parts of a web application, such as an API endpoint or a critical functionality, rather than the entire system. This approach is useful when there are known issues with certain components or when you want to reduce the risk by targeting business-critical parts for testing.

When it should be used:

Use this approach when you need to test specific components due to past issues or to focus on parts of the system that are crucial for business operations. It’s ideal for isolating and stress-testing individual components to find their breaking point before integrating them with the full system.

Pros:

• Provides flexibility by allowing you to test specific components or endpoints
• Can simulate targeted traffic for particular functionalities
• Helps identify weaknesses or breaking points without testing the full system
• Allows more control over the type and volume of traffic

Cons:

• Does not test how components behave together in the full system flow
• Might miss integration issues or problems that appear when components interact
• May not mimic real user behavior since full user flow is not always replicated

End-to-end Load Testing

What it is:

End-to-end load testing simulates real user behavior by testing the entire application workflow, from start to finish. It tracks the performance across all layers, including the frontend, backend, and any connected services, replicating how users typically interact with the app.

This type of testing can be done using protocol-level, browser-level, or hybrid approaches.

When it should be used:

End-to-end testing is ideal when you want to evaluate the entire system’s performance, particularly before launching new features or updates. It helps understand how the whole application performs under load, including how long requests take to process and how components work together.

Pros:

• Provides a complete view of the user experience and system performance
• Replicates real user interactions, making tests more realistic
• Reveals issues related to data flow, integration, and overall system behavior

Cons:

• More complex to set up and monitor
• Harder to identify the source of problems due to the number of components involved
• Less focused on individual components, making it more difficult to isolate specific issues.

Protocol-based Load Testing

What it is:

Protocol-based load testing evaluates the backend performance of an application by simulating requests that happen behind the scenes, without interacting with the user interface. This typically involves HTTP requests sent directly to servers or application components, bypassing the frontend.

When it should be used:

Protocol-based testing is ideal for assessing the server-side performance of an application, especially when testing backend components like APIs or databases. It can also be used for end-to-end website testing when a focus on server load is needed, without including frontend performance.

Pros:

• Simulates many requests to test server and backend capacity
• Provides insights into server response times and resource utilization
• Less resource-intensive compared to browser-based testing
• Can be used for both component and end-to-end testing

Cons:

• Does not measure frontend performance, like page load times or rendering issues
• Doesn’t replicate real user behavior, so it misses frontend-related user experience metrics
• May not fully capture how users interact with the application, as it bypasses the UI

Below is a sample protocol-based load testing script for bstackdemo.com, using k6 to simulate multiple HTTP requests for testing the homepage and viewing products.

The script checks the backend performance by sending requests directly to the server, without interacting with the frontend elements.

Talk to an Expert

import http from 'k6/http'; 

import { sleep, check } from 'k6';




export function Homepage() {

  const params = {

    'sec-ch-ua': '"Chromium";v="94", "Google Chrome";v="94", ";Not A Brand";v="99"',

    'accept-encoding': 'gzip, deflate, br',

    'accept-language': 'en-GB,en;q=0.9',

  };




  // Scenario: Testing the homepage loading and product listing




  // 01. Go to the homepage

  let responses = http.batch([

    ['GET', 'https://bstackdemo.com/', params],

    ['GET', 'https://bstackdemo.com/styles.css', params],

    ['GET', 'https://bstackdemo.com/images/logo.png', params],

    ['GET', 'https://bstackdemo.com/scripts/main.js', params],

  ]);

  check(responses, {

    'Homepage loaded': (r) => JSON.stringify(r).includes('Welcome to Bstackdemo'),

  });




  sleep(4);




  // 02. View products

  responses = http.batch([

    ['GET', 'https://bstackdemo.com/products', params],

    ['GET', 'https://bstackdemo.com/styles/product.css', params],

    ['GET', 'https://bstackdemo.com/images/product1.jpg', params],

    ['GET', 'https://bstackdemo.com/images/product2.jpg', params],

    ['GET', 'https://bstackdemo.com/scripts/product-list.js', params],

  ]);

  check(responses, {

    'Products loaded': (r) => JSON.stringify(r).includes('Add to Cart'),

  });




  sleep(1);

}

Browser-based Load Testing

What it is:

Browser-based load testing checks how an application performs on the frontend by simulating real users interacting with the site through a browser. It involves scripting actions like navigating to pages, clicking buttons, or filling out forms, which trigger backend requests.

When it should be used:

This type of testing is best for checking user experience, especially for Single-Page Applications (SPAs) or sites with dynamic content. It mimics real user behavior, making it ideal for testing how users interact with the website.

Pros:

• Simulates real user actions for accurate user experience testing
• Necessary for testing modern, dynamic websites like SPAs
• Can detect frontend issues like slow loading or UI delays

Cons:

• More resource-intensive than protocol-based testing
• Running multiple browser instances can be hard to scale for high loads
• Less efficient for backend performance testing

Below is a browser-based load testing script for the bstackdemo.com website using the k6 browser. This script simulates real user actions like visiting the homepage, viewing a product, and taking screenshots at different stages:

import { browser } from 'k6/experimental/browser';

import { sleep } from 'k6';




export default async function () {

  const page = browser.newPage();




  // 01. Go to the homepage

  try {

    await page.goto('https://bstackdemo.com');

    page.waitForSelector('h1'); // Wait for the main heading to ensure page has loaded

    page.screenshot({ path: 'screenshots/01_homepage.png' });




    sleep(4);




    // 02. View products

    const productLink = page.locator('a[class="product-title"]'); // Locate product link

    await productLink.click(); // Click on the product link

    page.waitForSelector('button[name="add-to-cart"]'); // Wait for the 'Add to Cart' button to appear

    page.screenshot({ path: 'screenshots/02_view-product.png' });




    sleep(1);

  } finally {

    page.close(); // Close the browser page after the test

  }

}

Pro Tip for Browser-Based Load Testing: Focus on scripting real user actions like clicks, using simple and unique selectors. After each action, check for expected elements and take screenshots to help with troubleshooting.

BrowserStack Automate simplifies this process by allowing tests to run on real devices and browsers without setup or maintenance, supporting frameworks like Selenium, Playwright, and Puppeteer.

Hybrid Load Testing

What it is:

Hybrid load testing combines both protocol-based and browser-based testing in a single script and tool. This approach tests both frontend and backend performance, providing a comprehensive view of system performance under load.

When it should be used:

Hybrid testing is ideal for testing both backend and frontend performance together, simplifying the process and reducing complexity.

Pros:

• Fewer load generators are needed, as protocol-based testing is more efficient
• Tests both backend and frontend performance in a single test
• Delivers a single set of results, simplifying script maintenance

Cons:

• Requires careful setup to balance both types of testing
• More complex than using just one testing method

Considerations while building Load Testing Scripts for websites

While creating Load Testing scripts for websites, it is best to keep some key factors in mind.

Consider factors that affect Script Realism.

1. Record Your User Journey: Use browser recorders to capture all webpage resources. This helps create the initial test script quickly.
2. Correlate Data: Recorded scripts may miss dynamic values. To achieve more realistic behavior, extract values from responses and reuse them in subsequent requests.
3. Include or Exclude Static Resources: Decide whether to include resources like images or JavaScript, depending on your test goals. Exclude them if using a CDN under a separate SLA.
4. Exclude Third-Party Requests: Don’t test third-party servers unless authorized. Many applications make calls to external services for various functions.
5. Use Concurrent Requests: Modern browsers often make requests in parallel. Simulate this behavior using batching.
6. Determine Cache and Cookie Behavior: By default, k6 resets cookies between iterations, but you can adjust this for more realistic cookie behavior.
7. Use Dynamic Think Time and Pacing: Add varying delays between actions to simulate real user pacing.
8. Use Test Data: Real users don’t submit identical data repeatedly. Add a test data file to randomize the inputs.
9. Model Test Parameters and Load Profile After Production: Choose the appropriate test options for production-like conditions to set the right load profile.

Consider factors that lead to a Reusable Framework

1. Use Tags and Groups: Organize requests by tagging and grouping for better understanding and metric consolidation.
2. Use Scenarios: Separate protocol-based and browser-based tests into scenarios for independent control over test parameters.
3. Modularize Scripts: Break down scripts into separate modules for protocol-level and browser-level testing. Execute them using a test runner.
4. Integrate Tests into CI Pipeline: Treat tests as code and integrate them into your CI/CD processes for continuous validation.

Consider Testing with Thresholds

1. Create Thresholds: Set specific thresholds for protocol- and browser-level tests, as they measure different metrics.
2. Use Hybrid Load Testing: To save resources, use protocol-based scripts to simulate most traffic, with fewer VUs for browser-based requests.

Consider factors for optimal Test Execution

1. Run Tests in the Right Environment: Pre-production tests help catch issues early but may not fully represent production results. Testing in production is more accurate but riskier, so take precautions to minimize impact.
2. Run Tests Where Your Customers Are: Choose load generator locations based on where your users are. Cloud-based testing helps simulate network latency and offers a more realistic picture than on-premise testing.

Pro Tip: To run tests in real-world conditions, use BrowserStack Automate. It allows you to test across multiple browsers and locations, simulating network latency and providing a more accurate, production-like experience, all without the risks of testing directly in production.

Key Features to consider when choosing a Load Testing Tool

After considering the optimal factors for creating test scripts, teams have to decide on the Load Testing tool to be used. In this regard, some key features need to be kept in mind –

1. Supported Protocols and Technologies: Make sure the tool supports the protocols your app uses (e.g., HTTP, WebSockets) and works well with technologies like single-page apps or microservices.
2. Scalability and Resource Efficiency: Check if the tool can simulate thousands of users without putting too much strain on your infrastructure, and whether it offers cloud-based execution for easier scalability.
3. Integration Capabilities: Look for tools that integrate well with your existing CI/CD pipeline, monitoring tools, and DevOps processes for continuous testing and smoother workflows.
4. Ease of Use and Scripting Flexibility: Choose a tool with an easy-to-use interface and scripting options that work for both technical and non-technical users, such as low-code or no-code options.
5. Reporting and Analytics: Ensure the tool provides real-time monitoring, clear insights, and customizable reports to quickly spot performance issues and trends.

Challenges in Load Testing a Website

Even when the most suitable tool is considered, teams face several challenges when trying to Load Test a website. Some major challenges faced by teams in this regard can be summed up as:

1. Unrealistic User Behavior Simulation: Scripts that mimic robotic behavior instead of human-like interactions fail to expose real-world performance issues.

Example: Testing a shopping site with users who don’t pause between actions can hide bottlenecks that appear during real-world hesitation.

2. Scalability Limitations of Testing Tools: Inadequate tool capacity prevents accurate simulation of large-scale traffic, skewing performance insights.

Example: Tools simulating 10,000 users may not handle enterprise-level traffic, leading to inaccurate results.

3. Dynamic Content and Session Management: Managing dynamic elements and user-specific data during tests is complex and error-prone.

Example: News sites with real-time updates may face sync errors under load.

4. Resource Bottlenecks: Hidden backend inefficiencies only surface under stress, risking outages.

Example: Video streaming crashes due to an unoptimized server CPU or memory leaks.

5. Inadequate Test Environments: Non-production environments produce misleading results, masking real-world failures.

Example: Banking apps tested on low-spec servers may overlook transaction delays.

Best Practices for Load Testing a Website

While challenges exist, following some best practices when load testing a website can help to alleviate some of the potential issues:

1. Define Clear Objectives and User Journeys: Test how an e-commerce checkout process handles 1,000 concurrent users during a flash sale to identify payment gateway bottlenecks.
2. Simulate Realistic User Behavior: Add random pauses between user actions (like browsing product pages) and mix device types to mimic actual visitor patterns.
3. Test in Production-Like Environments: Example: Use a staging environment with identical server specs and databases as production to avoid missing resource limits or configuration issues.
4. Gradually Increase Load and Monitor Resources: Start with 100 users, then ramp up to 10,000 while tracking CPU usage and response times to pinpoint when servers start slowing down.
5. Integrate Testing into Development Cycles: Run small-scale load tests after every code update to catch performance regressions early, such as a slow API response after a backend change.

Why choose Real Devices for Load Testing a Website?

Real devices replicate actual user interactions, capturing performance issues like slow rendering, network delays, or device-specific bottlenecks that simulators often miss.

Testing on real devices provides the most accurate picture of how your website performs for actual users in diverse environments.

• Real-World Accuracy: Captures performance issues tied to specific device hardware, OS versions, or browsers that emulators might miss.
• Network Variability: Simulates true network conditions like 3G, 4G, or unstable Wi-Fi, reflecting real-world latency and bandwidth challenges.
• Rendering Differences: Detects layout shifts, broken UI components, and font issues that appear only on specific screens or device types.
• User Behavior Simulation: Allows realistic interaction testing such as scrolling, zooming, or multitouch gestures.
• Browser-Specific Bugs: Identifies inconsistencies that occur only on certain browsers or browser versions on physical devices.
• Performance Validation: Confirms actual Time to Interactive (TTI), First Contentful Paint (FCP), and other Core Web Vitals across devices.
• High-Fidelity Results: Essential for customer-facing apps where experience consistency across devices is critical.

BrowserStack Automate complements load testing by enabling tests across 3,500+ real browsers and devices, ensuring your site handles traffic spikes while maintaining consistent functionality across diverse platforms. Its parallel testing and CI/CD integrations help validate performance under real-world conditions, catching environment-specific errors before users do.

Try BrowserStack Now

Conclusion

Load testing a website is essential to handle real user traffic smoothly and reliably. Businesses can identify and fix issues before they impact users by carefully planning tests, simulating realistic user behavior, and monitoring performance.

Regardless of the Load Testing approach implemented or the tool chosen, it is always best to use real devices in load testing, as this checks how the site works in real situations and finds problems before users notice them.